From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13874 invoked by alias); 3 May 2002 23:23:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 13832 invoked from network); 3 May 2002 23:23:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.83.203) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 3 May 2002 23:23:41 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (reddwarf.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.50]) by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA12139; Fri, 3 May 2002 16:23:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3CD318FD.4626750C@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 03 May 2002 16:23:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder Organization: Red Hat, Inc. X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain CC: ac131313@cygnus.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, muller@cerbere.u-strasbg.fr Subject: Re: [RFA]Use prev_lexptr in *-exp.y References: <200205032159.g43LxD313248@duracef.shout.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00084.txt.bz2 Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote: > > > Michael, I think Pierre was talking about Modula 2, Java, > > and Fortran. Does your testing cover those? > > There are no Modula 2 tests in the test suite, as far as I can see. > So I don't have any coverage for Modula 2. > > I don't cover Java. That is on my to-do list. > > There are two scripts in gdb.fortran with 116 tests. I cover those. > The tests are very basic; they don't actually compile any FORTRAN code. > They just exercise the expression parser. Well, that's exactly what we're changing, so it sounds like perhaps fortran is covered.