From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18863 invoked by alias); 3 May 2002 17:43:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 18855 invoked from network); 3 May 2002 17:43:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.83.203) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 3 May 2002 17:43:16 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (reddwarf.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.50]) by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA12485; Fri, 3 May 2002 10:43:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3CD2C930.52CAA3BE@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 03 May 2002 10:43:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder Organization: Red Hat, Inc. X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain CC: muller@cerbere.u-strasbg.fr, ac131313@cygnus.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA]Use prev_lexptr in *-exp.y References: <200205031352.g43DqHB15897@duracef.shout.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00070.txt.bz2 Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote: > > Pierre Muller writes: > > By the way, I don't have the necessary stuff to run the > > testsuite... Thus I can not warranty that there are no > > regressions. There mught be some wrong regressions, > > if some testsuite do check the error output in case of > > wrong expression entered. The error output should be more > > logical now, but could get some tests to fail. > > Pierre, > > I have that covered. I run the test suite every 5-10 days on many > configurations, and I have a good procedure for diff'ing the results > and finding regressions. So if there are changes in the gdb output and > they cause regressions in the test suite then I will catch them and post > detailed bug reports. Michael, I think Pierre was talking about Modula 2, Java, and Fortran. Does your testing cover those?