From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17388 invoked by alias); 3 May 2002 17:41:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 17374 invoked from network); 3 May 2002 17:41:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.83.203) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 3 May 2002 17:41:44 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (reddwarf.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.50]) by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA12293; Fri, 3 May 2002 10:41:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3CD2C8D6.22DA19C@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 03 May 2002 10:41:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder Organization: Red Hat, Inc. X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pierre Muller CC: Andrew Cagney , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA]Use prev_lexptr in *-exp.y References: <4.2.0.58.20020425103344.024be7a8@ics.u-strasbg.fr> <4.2.0.58.20020425183926.020b6350@ics.u-strasbg.fr> <4.2.0.58.20020502153022.03355760@ics.u-strasbg.fr> <4.2.0.58.20020503100132.01ae1b08@ics.u-strasbg.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00069.txt.bz2 Pierre Muller wrote: > > At 19:49 02/05/2002 , Michael Snyder a écrit: > >Pierre Muller wrote: > > > > > > At 20:38 25/04/2002 , Michael Snyder a écrit: > > > >Pierre Muller wrote: > > > > > > > > > > At 17:30 25/04/2002 , Andrew Cagney a écrit: > > > > > >>2002-04-25 Pierre Muller > > > > > >>* p-exp.y: Also use new prev_lexptr variable > > > > > >> to improve error reporting. Based on Michael Snyder > > > > > >> 2002-04-24 dated patch to c-exp.y. > > > > > > > > > > > >Nice. Can I suggest creating bug report so we know that the others should be done. > > > > > > > > > > This is more work than fixing them directly! > > > > > > > >ROTFL! You rock, Pierre! > > > > > > May I consider this as an approval and commit this patch? > > > >Aha, the files have no maintainer! OK, yes, donning my omnipotence hat, > >I approve your change. ;-) > > Thanks, committed. > > By the way, I don't have the necessary stuff to run the > testsuite... Thus I can not warranty that there are no > regressions. There mught be some wrong regressions, > if some testsuite do check the error output in case of > wrong expression entered. The error output should be more > logical now, but could get some tests to fail. Yes, I'm waiting for someone to complain. None of the C or C++ tests have failed because of this (and I presume you've tested pascal).