Re: gnu-nat.c patch mangled

[Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>]

Roland McGrath wrote:
> 
> My patch to gdb/gnu-nat.c (committed in rev 1.20) did not make it intact.
> 
> This patch vs the current file is needed to properly effect the changes
> from my original patch.  I'm not including an extra log entry since this
> was part of the same change I submitted.  I don't know how it got lost
> in the commit.

Sorry, Roland.  Committed.

> 
> Index: gnu-nat.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/gnu-nat.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.20
> diff -u -b -p -r1.20 gnu-nat.c
> --- gnu-nat.c   24 Apr 2002 21:44:46 -0000      1.20
> +++ gnu-nat.c   30 Apr 2002 18:22:51 -0000
> @@ -2536,6 +2536,16 @@ gnu_find_memory_regions (int (*func) (CO
>           last_protection = protection;
>         }
>      }
> +
> +  /* Report the final region.  */
> +  if (last_region_end > last_region_address && last_protection != VM_PROT_NONE)
> +    (*func) (last_region_address, last_region_end - last_region_address,
> +            last_protection & VM_PROT_READ,
> +            last_protection & VM_PROT_WRITE,
> +            last_protection & VM_PROT_EXECUTE,
> +            data);
> +
> +  return 0;
>  }
> 
>