From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16838 invoked by alias); 29 Apr 2002 16:18:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16820 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2002 16:18:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (66.31.105.161) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 29 Apr 2002 16:18:39 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 140C43D64; Mon, 29 Apr 2002 12:18:41 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3CCD7260.8050207@cygnus.com> Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 09:18:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:0.9.9) Gecko/20020424 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: S390[x] configuration update References: <20020427192408.A6259@nevyn.them.org> <20020427202525.A8877@nevyn.them.org> <20020427203648.A9559@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg01120.txt.bz2 > On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 02:31:33AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote: > >> Daniel Jacobowitz writes: >> >> |> The updated patch looks >> |> good to me; you can probably just commit it, since it fixes a build >> |> failure and is quite straightforward. >> >> Done. What about the 5.2 branch? Is it still possible to get this into >> the release? > > > Don't think so, since Andrew seems to have already rolled the release > tarball. Yes, definitly closed. I also suspect there is no benefit in pulling it into the 5.2 branch once unfrozen. The existing stuff ``works'' - as they say, if it ain't broke don't fix it :-) enjoy, Andrew