Re: [RFA] Improve Sparc epilogue analysis

David S. Miller
2002-04-25T01:02:20Z

From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 17:36:02 -0700

"David S. Miller" wrote:
> I'd like to ask that you re-review this change, given this, please.

The part that's mentioned in the changelog entry is OK, except
you can remove sparc_skip_prologue_frameless_p (and say so in
the changelog) rather than rewrite it.

Wait a second, how can I remove sparc_skip_prologue_frameless_p
when it isn't even there anymore? :-)

What exists is "sparc_prologue_frameless_p" which is a boolean.
That is what replaces the functionality for what I removed
(sparc_skip_prologue_frameless_p, SKIP_PROLOGUE_FRAMELESS_P,
et al.).

I think you're still a little confused on the current state of
the tree.