From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-14676-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 2777 invoked by alias); 24 Apr 2002 01:20:11 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 2740 invoked from network); 24 Apr 2002 01:20:11 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 Apr 2002 01:20:11 -0000
Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 2B19B3CC5; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 21:20:10 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <3CC6084A.50001@cygnus.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 18:20:00 -0000
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:0.9.9) Gecko/20020328
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>,
	gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] Fix sparc64 pop/push frame reg saving
References: <20020420.013839.70807514.davem@redhat.com> <3CC5B6ED.7BFD1E5D@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00897.txt.bz2

> 
> David, I see that this is based on your renumbering of the
> sparc64 registers (submitted separately).  I don't think
> that renumbering is allowable.  Even if we disregarded
> embedded sparc64 targets, wouldn't this break Solaris?

Yes.  The macro's REGISTER_RAW_SIZE an REGISTER_BYTE are 
``untouchable''.  At least for the moment.  Should dust off my remote.c 
code.

Andrew