From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31352 invoked by alias); 24 Apr 2002 00:23:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 31301 invoked from network); 24 Apr 2002 00:23:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.83.203) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 Apr 2002 00:23:06 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (reddwarf.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.50]) by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA14622; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 17:23:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3CC5F819.A6C792AE@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 17:23:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder Organization: Red Hat, Inc. X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Elena Zannoni CC: Fernando Nasser , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA/Testsuite] help.exp References: <15557.59634.944097.218566@localhost.redhat.com> <3CC5ECDF.4FDFB9B6@redhat.com> <3CC5F1D8.C58F55C7@redhat.com> <15557.62307.629214.953018@localhost.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00895.txt.bz2 Elena Zannoni wrote: > > Fernando Nasser writes: > > Michael Snyder wrote: > > > > > > Or you could just use a parenthesis to make the > > > powerpc command output optional... > > > > > > > Good idea, more specific than my suggested '.*'. But we don't > > need to be so stringent in this case. As long as we see the > > generic ones the help is working. > > > > Unless Elena wants to test if these commands show up for the powerpc > > targets help. In this case, neither my suggestion or yours are > > checking for it. :-( > > > > Nah, I don't really want to be that specific. > > > If that is the case, we will have to go with Elena's original patch. > > > > But you guys decide, if we got rid of the wildcards do we want them back? I was only deleting them where I thought they were unnecessary. In this case, I was wrong, 'cause I didn't know PPC had its own variants. So yes, it would be appropriate to put that one back. Michael