From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22887 invoked by alias); 23 Apr 2002 20:33:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 22867 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2002 20:33:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.83.203) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 23 Apr 2002 20:33:21 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (reddwarf.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.50]) by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA25172; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 13:33:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3CC5C242.D975892F@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 13:33:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder Organization: Red Hat, Inc. X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gdb@sources.redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: [RFC] Time for a shared linux-nat.c module? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00880.txt.bz2 I notice that there are now a bunch of -linux-tdep.c modules, and that some of them share a bunch of duplicate code. I'm wondering if it isn't time to create a linux-nat.c module, shared by all host architectures, into which we can move some of this code instead of maintaining separate, duplicate versions. Michael