From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12809 invoked by alias); 23 Apr 2002 20:17:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 12792 invoked from network); 23 Apr 2002 20:17:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.83.203) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 23 Apr 2002 20:17:04 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (reddwarf.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.50]) by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA23287; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 13:17:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3CC5BE70.22BFE44D@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 13:17:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder Organization: Red Hat, Inc. X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch] fix pr reference syntax in gdb.c++/method.exp References: <200204231921.g3NJLtG25527@duracef.shout.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00878.txt.bz2 Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote: > > Hmmm. Sometimes, like this time, I post patches to testsuite/gdb.c++ > that I am committing immediately. And sometimes, I post patches for > testsuite/gdb.c++ and give people a day or two to comment before I commit. > Right now I am marking both of these as "[patch]". I think the custom is to mark the second type as "[RFA]". > Michael Snyder writes: > > If you want to avoid ambiguity, you could say "committed" > > in your original "PATCH" message. > > I will do that, unless Andrew has something to say (I thought he > liked to see explicit "committed" messages to help him mananage > his inbox). I think that was meant to apply to the "[RFA]" genre.