From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6750 invoked by alias); 19 Apr 2002 01:16:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 6726 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2002 01:16:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.83.203) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Apr 2002 01:16:39 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (reddwarf.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.50]) by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA02382; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 18:16:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3CBF6D3C.FE673A6D@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 18:16:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder Organization: Red Hat, Inc. X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, ezannoni@redhat.com Subject: Re: gdb.asm/asm-source.exp creation of arch.inc doesn't work for relative ${srcdir} References: <20020416010713.A32200@nevyn.them.org> <15548.13764.336835.513002@localhost.redhat.com> <20020416125646.A25162@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00618.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 10:31:32AM -0400, Elena Zannoni wrote: > > How about the following. Somebody reminded me that there is no > > technical reason to use a symlink at all. I tried with relative and > > absolute paths, and seems to work fine. Can you try it? > > It works, with one caveat: So who'll check it in? [this is approval]