From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23767 invoked by alias); 10 Apr 2002 23:16:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23760 invoked from network); 10 Apr 2002 23:16:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.230.5) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 Apr 2002 23:16:37 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (reddwarf.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.24.50]) by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA07510; Wed, 10 Apr 2002 16:16:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3CB4C50D.677DCC52@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 16:16:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder Organization: Red Hat, Inc. X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Cagney CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: non-mulit-arch compiles probs References: <3CB45339.2010007@cygnus.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00413.txt.bz2 Andrew Cagney wrote: > > FYI, > > The file std-regs.c doesn't compile with -Werror on non-multi-arch > targets. They all dropped like flies. > > Adding to the fun, I've found an entry for the ``how did this ever > compile'' category: > > exec.c:print_section_info (struct target_ops *t, bfd *abfd) > maint.c:print_section_info (const char *name, flagword flags, > > (one is static, the other has a .h declaration). Doesn't the static one override the global one?