Re: Nother little one, this time in varobj.c

[Fernando Nasser <fnasser@redhat.com>]

Keith Seitz wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Jim Ingham wrote:
> 
> > BTW, I am not sure why it is necessary to call reinit_frame_cache here.
> > Keith, do you remember why this was necessary?  It is inefficient,
> > especially if you are evaluating a bunch of variables that are fairly
> > high up on the stack.  But since I don't remember why this was done, I
> > am reluctant to just change it outright...
> 
> I haven't a clue, actually. When I originally wrote varobj for Insight, it
> did not allow varobjs to change frames dynamically, as it does now.
> Presumably, this was all added at the same time. (Or I've forgotten all
> about it...)
> 

The frames code was already there when I converted it to gdbtk-varobj.c,
so it was added in between.  It seemed to work though.

-- 
Fernando Nasser
Red Hat Canada Ltd.                     E-Mail:  fnasser@redhat.com
2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
Toronto, Ontario   M4P 2C9