From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27205 invoked by alias); 9 Apr 2002 20:49:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 27198 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2002 20:49:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 9 Apr 2002 20:49:36 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CB183CC2; Tue, 9 Apr 2002 16:49:38 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3CB353E2.8050205@cygnus.com> Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2002 13:49:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:0.9.9) Gecko/20020328 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michal Ludvig Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] x86-64-linux-nat.c cleanup References: <3CB34860.3000704@suse.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00371.txt.bz2 > Hi all, > because x86-64 ptrace() now conforms to standards, I removed our versions of child_resume and child_xfer_memory from x86-64-linux.nat.c and started to use those from infptrace.c. This is an obvious change, but quite large, so I'm sending it for approval first. > So, can I commit? > > Michal Ludvig Yes, 5.2 branch if you think it helps as well. Andrew