From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23978 invoked by alias); 8 Apr 2002 20:55:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 23934 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2002 20:55:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Apr 2002 20:55:23 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 766F93CBF; Mon, 8 Apr 2002 16:55:24 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3CB203BC.2010405@cygnus.com> Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2002 13:55:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:0.9.9) Gecko/20020328 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rob Savoye Cc: Fernando Nasser , Michael Elizabeth Chastain , drow@mvista.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFC: KFAIL DejaGnu patch References: <200204051753.g35HrUn23328@duracef.shout.net> <3CAE4182.BED29D4D@redhat.com> <20020407173534.B16561@welcomehome.org> <3CB1B7E3.799AC665@redhat.com> <20020408100922.C3523@welcomehome.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00319.txt.bz2 > On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 11:31:47AM -0400, Fernando Nasser wrote: > > >> I don't know DocBook, but I can certainly try. I hope to be able to >> do it next weekend. > > > I found docbook2texi, which (if it worked) let me generate texinfo -> info > from Docbook source. Once I get that to work, I'll probably drop the old > texinfo doc completely to avoid confusion. (Put on flame proof jacket :-). Um, I really have no desire to have to learn yet another documentation language (Ask Eli how painfull it has been having me learn the current one). Especially when all other GNU projects I'm involved in use texinfo. Is there any absolutly compelling reason to not convert the current docbook back to texinfo and, instead, stick with that? Andrew