From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25554 invoked by alias); 8 Apr 2002 16:06:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 25480 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2002 16:06:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.230.5) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Apr 2002 16:06:21 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (rtl.cygnus.com [205.180.230.21]) by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA15297; Mon, 8 Apr 2002 09:04:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3CB1BEF2.BE231844@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2002 09:06:00 -0000 From: Fernando Nasser Organization: Red Hat Canada X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain CC: rob@welcomehome.org, ac131313@cygnus.com, drow@mvista.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFC: KFAILs [Was: [RFA/mi-testsuite] XFAIL mi*-console.exp] References: <200204081554.g38FsfY22706@duracef.shout.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00307.txt.bz2 Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote: > > I'm running dejagnu with the kfail patch all the time now, just for > the experience. I put in some kfail's in gdb.c++/cplusfuncs.exp > but I can't commit them. > > Another feature request ... > > lib/framework.exp has a "proc xfail" which directly generates an xfail, > instead of calling "setup_xfail ... ; fail ... ". There is also a > "proc xpass". > > gdb uses "proc xfail". So, could you add "proc kfail" and "proc kpass"? > Sure. Will do. -- Fernando Nasser Red Hat Canada Ltd. E-Mail: fnasser@redhat.com 2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300 Toronto, Ontario M4P 2C9