From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9901 invoked by alias); 8 Apr 2002 15:41:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 9839 invoked from network); 8 Apr 2002 15:41:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.230.5) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Apr 2002 15:41:21 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (rtl.cygnus.com [205.180.230.21]) by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id IAA13247; Mon, 8 Apr 2002 08:39:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3CB1B8F8.522C6984@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2002 08:41:00 -0000 From: Fernando Nasser Organization: Red Hat Canada X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rob Savoye CC: Michael Elizabeth Chastain , ac131313@cygnus.com, drow@mvista.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: RFC: KFAILs [Was: [RFA/mi-testsuite] XFAIL mi*-console.exp] References: <200204051909.g35J99P32716@duracef.shout.net> <20020407173813.C16561@welcomehome.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00302.txt.bz2 Rob Savoye wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 01:09:09PM -0600, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote: > > Actually I prefer the pair "kpass/kfail" to "xpass/kfail" and "xpass/xfail"! > > "xpass/kfail" looks weird and lets in some ambiguity. Can you implement it > > as "kpass/kfail"? > > I prefer kpass/kfail too. > OK, I will make the changes (maybe tomorrow night) and repost. -- Fernando Nasser Red Hat Canada Ltd. E-Mail: fnasser@redhat.com 2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300 Toronto, Ontario M4P 2C9