From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31497 invoked by alias); 5 Apr 2002 21:50:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 31489 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2002 21:50:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 5 Apr 2002 21:50:43 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09FED3C9F; Fri, 5 Apr 2002 16:50:42 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3CAE1C31.6090001@cygnus.com> Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2002 13:50:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:0.9.9) Gecko/20020328 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: Elena Zannoni , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA/RFC] Multilibs and gdb.asm References: <15534.5336.562102.896601@localhost.redhat.com> <20020405164258.A30688@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00186.txt.bz2 > On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 04:19:20PM -0500, Elena Zannoni wrote: > >> >> In gdb.asm/asm-source.exp, the testsuite passes multilib options to >> the assembler according to the compiler syntax. >> Obviously this doesn't work, as already noted by Nick Clifton in: >> >> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2002-01/msg00282.html >> >> A solution wasn't reached at the time. >> >> I found it useful to just bail out of the test if some multilibs were >> detected. At least it reduced the noise in the testsuite results. >> >> Is this too drastic? > > > I've got a silly suggestion. Is there any reason not to assemble by > invoking the compiler, for this test? Let it do all the multilib > footwork. What compiler? (There may be an assembler and linker but no compiler) Andrew