From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 541 invoked by alias); 5 Apr 2002 19:19:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 524 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2002 19:19:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.230.5) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 5 Apr 2002 19:19:04 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (notinuse.cygnus.com [205.180.231.12]) by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA16696; Fri, 5 Apr 2002 11:19:03 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3CADF5F7.311F8A01@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2002 11:19:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder Organization: Red Hat, Inc. X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Cagney CC: Michael Snyder , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add overlay event support to testcase. References: <200204041937.g34JbPT11046@reddwarf.cygnus.com> <3CACB764.2010409@cygnus.com> <3CACCB12.649802F8@redhat.com> <3CACD894.5000506@cygnus.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00177.txt.bz2 Andrew Cagney wrote: > > > Andrew Cagney wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > 2002-04-04 Michael Snyder > >> > > >> > * gdb.base/ovlymgr.c: Add overlay event breakpoint support. > > > >> > >> Will adding this mean that the event-breakpoint mechanism is the only > >> one tested? > > > > > > Hmmm, good question. I guess it will. > > Should I clone the test case so we test both? > > Or test both from the same test - a command to force each mechanism? That seems bogus. GDB auto-detects whether the event mechanism can be supported. I don't think the user needs a means to override that. I can test both if I provide two versions of the overlay manager -- one with event support and one without.