From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29213 invoked by alias); 4 Apr 2002 18:58:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 29205 invoked from network); 4 Apr 2002 18:58:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Apr 2002 18:58:02 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2C6E3E79; Thu, 4 Apr 2002 13:58:00 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3CACA238.8090601@cygnus.com> Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2002 10:58:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:0.9.9) Gecko/20020328 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz , Elena Zannoni Cc: Michael Elizabeth Chastain , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] import drow dbxread.c fix to branch References: <200204040536.g345a6t30923@duracef.shout.net> <20020404010112.A13460@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00114.txt.bz2 > On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 11:36:06PM -0600, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote: > >> DanielJ writes: > >> > Only shows on GCC 3.1, eh? I'll try to look at it later, but I have no >> > post-3.0 toolchain installed right now. Actually, I should >> > investigate, to make sure it isn't a 3.1 regression... > >> >> On the next spin, I'll make a special report of regressions for gcc >> 3.0.4 versus gcc-3_1-branch. You can already look at "difference by gcc" >> in the regular report if you want to pick up a hot spot or two. >> >> BTW my test harness now saves the whole test directory, including all >> the executable files. In fact I'll just throw some tarball up in my >> ftp directory in case it might help someone: >> >> ftp://ftp.shout.net/pub/users/mec/gdb/for-pr-gdb-381.tar.gz >> ftp://ftp.shout.net/pub/users/mec/gdb/for-pr-gdb-381-src.tar.gz > > > Thanks. It does help - that was pretty easy, actually :). I've found > the bug; mi-cmd-disassemble does not recognize '0' line numbers, and it > needs to. I don't know why only 3.1 triggers this. Probably a > function padding thing; the end of the previous function seems to share > a PC with the beginning of the one being listed. Here's a patch; > Andrew, how's this look? For this command, I'm the wrong person to ask. Elena? Andrew