[RFA/mi-testsuite] XFAIL mi*-console.exp

Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-04-03T00:42:50Z

These tests are testing for a feature that exists either nowhere or just in
simulators and some remote stubs: that the inferior's output goes through
GDB and is properly encoded by the MI layer. Since support isn't there for
many remote debugging stubs or for native, I think these two tests should be
XFAIL'd. Does that make sense, Andrew? If so, OK to commit this?

--
Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer

2002-04-02 Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>

* gdb.mi/mi-console.exp: Accept lack of MI-console output as an
XFAIL.
* gdb.mi/mi0-console.exp: Likewise.

Index: testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-console.exp
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi-console.exp,v
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -p -r1.7 mi-console.exp
--- mi-console.exp 2001/08/19 01:23:43 1.7
+++ mi-console.exp 2002/04/03 00:38:09
@@ -92,7 +92,10 @@ gdb_expect {
# multiple event sources to channel the output back through the
# MI.

- fail "Hello message (known bug)"
+ xfail "Hello message (known limitation)"
+ }
+ -notransfer -re "\r\n$mi_gdb_prompt" {
+ xfail "Hello message (no output)"
}
timeout {
fail "Hello message (timeout)"
Index: testsuite/gdb.mi/mi0-console.exp
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.mi/mi0-console.exp,v
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -p -r1.5 mi0-console.exp
--- mi0-console.exp 2001/08/19 01:23:43 1.5
+++ mi0-console.exp 2002/04/03 00:38:09
@@ -92,7 +92,10 @@ gdb_expect {
# multiple event sources to channel the output back through the
# MI.

- fail "Hello message (known bug)"
+ xfail "Hello message (known limitation)"
+ }
+ -notransfer -re "\r\n$mi_gdb_prompt" {
+ xfail "Hello message (no output)"
}
timeout {
fail "Hello message (timeout)"