Re: [RFA/mi-testsuite] XFAIL mi*-console.exp

Andrew Cagney
2002-04-06T23:04:50Z

> On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 04:49:54PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>
>> >OK, so it isn't an XFAIL. I don't think FAIL is really appropriate
>> >either; tests which test a not-yet-implemented feature (and one that I
>> >think is a bad idea, for native targets, to be honest) don't add any
>> >information by failing. UNSUPPORTED perhaps? Or just not running the
>> >test in native setups, for now?
>
>> Er, actually, XFAIL might be closer to the truth than UNSUPPORTED.
>> Although neither indicate UNIMPLEMENTED.
>
>
> I'm just going to sit on this patch until we can decide what the result
> should be. I've posted both XFAIL and UNSUPPORTED versions for your
> viewing pleasure...

Suggest a bug report so it isn't forgotten.

Andrew