From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14307 invoked by alias); 4 Apr 2002 02:59:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 14246 invoked from network); 4 Apr 2002 02:59:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (24.112.240.27) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Apr 2002 02:59:51 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E84673E5F; Wed, 3 Apr 2002 20:15:45 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3CABA941.4050005@cygnus.com> Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2002 18:59:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:0.9.9) Gecko/20020328 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Berlin Cc: Jim Blandy , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Let dwarf2 CFI's execute_stack_op be used outside of CFI References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00087.txt.bz2 > On 28 Mar 2002, Jim Blandy wrote: > > >> >> I've read through the new Dwarf spec some more. You're right --- >> they've added a bunch of stuff like DW_OP_push_object_address and >> DW_OP_call, and cases where you're supposed to push stuff on the >> stack, etc. >> >> But what I'm going for here is something we could, in the long run, >> put in libiberty and just have GDB use from there. Surely there are >> other applications that could use a Dwarf expression interpreter. > > > I'm not so sure about this, that's the reason I think you might be > overengineering it. Yes, I'd tend to agree. enjoy, Andrew