From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14314 invoked by alias); 4 Apr 2002 02:59:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 14245 invoked from network); 4 Apr 2002 02:59:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (24.112.240.27) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Apr 2002 02:59:51 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C6083E5C; Wed, 3 Apr 2002 16:21:31 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3CAB725B.3060900@cygnus.com> Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2002 18:59:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:0.9.9) Gecko/20020328 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: FYI: gdbserver branch merges References: <20020329141059.B12204@nevyn.them.org> <20020331004840.A23003@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00088.txt.bz2 > On Sun, Mar 31, 2002 at 07:41:08AM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >> >> On Fri, 29 Mar 2002, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: >> > >> > I've moved these patches to the branch. > >> >> Does the manual need any changes as result of these merges? If so, >> could you please submit the changes for the docs as well? >> >> TIA > > > No, it doesn't. Thanks for checking. Well yes and no :-) It doesn't introduce any new features (so no) but the remote debugging chapter's gdbserver section does need some work (so yes) :-). enjoy, Andrew