From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-13710-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 7862 invoked by alias); 28 Mar 2002 01:09:28 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 7832 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2002 01:09:25 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.230.5)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 28 Mar 2002 01:09:25 -0000
Received: from redhat.com (notinuse.cygnus.com [205.180.231.12])
	by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA14721;
	Wed, 27 Mar 2002 17:09:19 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <3CA26AB5.C6940728@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 17:09:00 -0000
From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@redhat.com>
Organization: Red Hat, Inc.
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
CC: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>, Michael Snyder <msnyder@cygnus.com>,
        gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] New commands, dump/restore memory<-->file
References: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1020327084845.5838L-100000@is> <3CA237BC.F1019319@redhat.com> <3CA23CF9.8090601@cygnus.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00562.txt.bz2

Andrew Cagney wrote:
> 
> > Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On Tue, 26 Mar 2002, Michael Snyder wrote:
> >>
> >
> >> > Back in January, there was a discussion about adding commands that
> >> > would allow gdb to copy data from target memory to a file and back
> >> > again.  Andrew and I have done an implementation of those commands,
> >> > and here it is for your approval.
> >
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >>
> >> I find it disturbing, to say the least, that more and more new commands
> >> come without documentation.  Please consider adding some minimal docs.
> >
> >
> > Thanks for the nag.  ;-)
> > Would you consider the "Files" section to be more appropriate,
> > or the "Examining Data" section?
> >
> > Michael
> 
> or a new chapter: ``Dump and Restore'' with tutorial?

Hmmm, I don't know if they're _that_ major...