From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10413 invoked by alias); 27 Mar 2002 21:31:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10398 invoked from network); 27 Mar 2002 21:31:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.230.5) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 27 Mar 2002 21:31:56 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (notinuse.cygnus.com [205.180.231.12]) by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA02828; Wed, 27 Mar 2002 13:31:50 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3CA237BC.F1019319@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 13:31:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder Organization: Red Hat, Inc. X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eli Zaretskii CC: Michael Snyder , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] New commands, dump/restore memory<-->file References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00552.txt.bz2 Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > On Tue, 26 Mar 2002, Michael Snyder wrote: > > > Back in January, there was a discussion about adding commands that > > would allow gdb to copy data from target memory to a file and back > > again. Andrew and I have done an implementation of those commands, > > and here it is for your approval. > > Thanks. > > I find it disturbing, to say the least, that more and more new commands > come without documentation. Please consider adding some minimal docs. Thanks for the nag. ;-) Would you consider the "Files" section to be more appropriate, or the "Examining Data" section? Michael