From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28425 invoked by alias); 27 Mar 2002 16:29:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 28413 invoked from network); 27 Mar 2002 16:29:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 27 Mar 2002 16:29:00 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71D8A3E3F; Wed, 27 Mar 2002 11:27:17 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3CA1F2E5.6030201@cygnus.com> Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 08:29:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:0.9.8) Gecko/20020210 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: Michael Snyder , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] New commands, dump/restore memory<-->file References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00541.txt.bz2 > On Tue, 26 Mar 2002, Michael Snyder wrote: > > >> Back in January, there was a discussion about adding commands that >> would allow gdb to copy data from target memory to a file and back >> again. Andrew and I have done an implementation of those commands, >> and here it is for your approval. > > > Thanks. > > I find it disturbing, to say the least, that more and more new commands > come without documentation. Please consider adding some minimal docs. Yes (given I'm one of the guilty party) I'll have to agree). (My advanced features section question now hopefully makes more sense :-) Assuming the command syntax is agreed then the doco changes should be part of the same commit that adds the commands. Andrew