From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9918 invoked by alias); 26 Mar 2002 22:46:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 9875 invoked from network); 26 Mar 2002 22:46:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.230.5) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 26 Mar 2002 22:46:31 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (notinuse.cygnus.com [205.180.231.12]) by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA23491; Tue, 26 Mar 2002 14:46:27 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3CA0F7BD.FB3F4EAF@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 14:46:00 -0000 From: Michael Snyder Organization: Red Hat, Inc. X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: fnf@redhat.com CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, fnf@ninemoons.com Subject: Re: [RFA] Accept compiler internal use of memcpy/bcopy for structs References: <200203260322.g2Q3MZb11877@fred.ninemoons.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00508.txt.bz2 Fred Fish wrote: > > > Would you please try the attached modification of your patch, > > and let me know if it is acceptable? > > Yes, that works. I've attached the actual patch I tried (there was an > extra '}' in the patch you suggested). OK to check in? OK by me... > > -Fred > > 2002-03-25 Fred Fish > > * gdb.base/step-test.exp: Accept stopping in memcpy/bcopy when we > have debugging info for those functions and the compiler uses them > internally to copy structs around. > > Index: gdb.base/step-test.exp > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/step-test.exp,v > retrieving revision 1.3 > diff -c -p -r1.3 step-test.exp > *** step-test.exp 2001/03/06 08:21:51 1.3 > --- step-test.exp 2002/03/26 03:20:34 > *************** gdb_test \ > *** 212,220 **** > gdb_test "continue" \ > ".*Breakpoint ${decimal},.*large_struct_by_value.*" \ > "run to pass large struct" > ! gdb_test "step" \ > ! ".*step-test.exp: arrive here 1.*" \ > ! "large struct by value" > > gdb_continue_to_end "step-test.exp" > > --- 212,234 ---- > gdb_test "continue" \ > ".*Breakpoint ${decimal},.*large_struct_by_value.*" \ > "run to pass large struct" > ! send_gdb "step\n" > ! gdb_expect { > ! -re ".*step-test.exp: arrive here 1.*$gdb_prompt $" { > ! pass "large struct by value" > ! } > ! -re ".*(memcpy|bcopy).*$gdb_prompt $" { > ! send_gdb "finish\n" ; gdb_expect -re "$gdb_prompt $" > ! send_gdb "step\n" > ! exp_continue > ! } > ! -re ".*$gdb_prompt $" { > ! fail "large struct by value" > ! } > ! timeout { > ! fail "large struct by value (timeout)" > ! } > ! } > > gdb_continue_to_end "step-test.exp" >