From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5034 invoked by alias); 26 Mar 2002 18:09:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 5018 invoked from network); 26 Mar 2002 18:08:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO kerberos.suse.cz) (195.47.106.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 26 Mar 2002 18:08:57 -0000 Received: from chimera.suse.cz (chimera.suse.cz [10.20.0.2]) by kerberos.suse.cz (SuSE SMTP server) with ESMTP id 3335959D348 for ; Tue, 26 Mar 2002 19:08:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from suse.cz (leviathan.suse.cz [10.20.1.56]) by chimera.suse.cz (8.11.0/8.11.0/SuSE Linux 8.11.0-0.4) with ESMTP id g2QI8up00824 for ; Tue, 26 Mar 2002 19:08:56 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: chimera.suse.cz: Host leviathan.suse.cz [10.20.1.56] claimed to be suse.cz Message-ID: <3CA0B937.9000200@suse.cz> Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 10:09:00 -0000 From: Michal Ludvig Organization: SuSE CR User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.9) Gecko/20020310 X-Accept-Language: cs, cz, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] x86-64 segment registers handling References: <3CA0AF53.8030609@suse.cz> <3CA0B6C0.6090601@cygnus.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00498.txt.bz2 Andrew Cagney wrote: > ChangeLogs are full sentences so start with a capital and end with a > full stop. The entry > > (x86_64_register_raw_size), > > (x86_64_register_virtual_type), > > (x86_64_register_name), > > (_initialize_x86_64_tdep): Changed to reflect new > is written as: > > (x86_64_register_raw_size, x86_64_register_virtual_type) > > (x86_64_register_name, _initialize_x86_64_tdep): Changed > to reflect new > (but I'm not 100% sure - Eli is better at this - and after too many > years I'm still learning it :-) Few days ago Kevin Buettner told me the opposit: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2002-03/msg00050.html Now I'm a bit confused :-(( > Structs are indented as: > > struct foo > { > int blah; > }; I will change it before committing. Thanks Michal Ludvig -- * SuSE CR, s.r.o * mludvig@suse.cz * +420 2 9654 5373 * http://www.suse.cz