From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3193 invoked by alias); 26 Mar 2002 15:10:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 3184 invoked from network); 26 Mar 2002 15:10:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.230.5) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 26 Mar 2002 15:10:13 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (rtl.cygnus.com [205.180.230.21]) by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id HAA05144; Tue, 26 Mar 2002 07:10:08 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3CA08ED2.6EA90BDE@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 07:10:00 -0000 From: Fernando Nasser Organization: Red Hat Canada X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz CC: fnf@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Your patch to list.exp References: <20020325201108.A28503@nevyn.them.org> <200203260412.g2Q4CAw12281@fred.ninemoons.com> <20020325233016.A2984@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00488.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > > Hmm, don't know. I do know that I originally found this problem with > > an actual remote target for which the patch is OK. > > I just verified that the test fails if you have debugging info for > _start. In light of that, please consider reverting this (and maybe an > informative comment...). > It seems this test may eventually work with a remote target, but it is only supposed to work always with native targets. I guess the only thing that we can do is to run it only for natives. I agree that the patch must be reverted and that a comment is a good idea. Thanks for catching this Daniel. Regards, Fernando -- Fernando Nasser Red Hat Canada Ltd. E-Mail: fnasser@redhat.com 2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300 Toronto, Ontario M4P 2C9