From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-13576-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 18383 invoked by alias); 22 Mar 2002 19:45:26 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 18350 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2002 19:45:19 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 22 Mar 2002 19:45:19 -0000
Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 2F4313F2F; Fri, 22 Mar 2002 14:45:17 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <3C9B89CC.2030001@cygnus.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 11:45:00 -0000
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:0.9.8) Gecko/20020210
X-Accept-Language: en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
Cc: "Martin M. Hunt" <hunt@redhat.com>, Chris <cgd@broadcom.com>,
	gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: RFA: MIPS and builtin_type_{double,float}
References: <20020322141634.A27843@nevyn.them.org> <3C9B8705.8090407@cygnus.com> <20020322143745.A28836@nevyn.them.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00428.txt.bz2

> On Fri, Mar 22, 2002 at 02:33:25PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> 
>> [Adding MartinH and CGD to To: line.> 2002-03-22  Daniel Jacobowitz 
>> <drow@mvista.com>
> 
>> >
>> >* mips-tdep.c (mips_float_register_type): New function.
>> > (mips_double_register_type): New function.
>> > (mips_print_register): Use them.
>> > (do_fp_register_row): Likewise.
>> >
> 
>> 
>> Perfect!  Suggest a NEWS entry.
> 
> 
> Saying what?  It has no effect except preventative, since these were
> always the existing types.

I'm thinking of the entire change - fix the FP output and its types. 
The MIPS should be correctly displaying the FP values now.

>> The next question is pulling the whole thing into the branch.  The two 
>> (other) people that immediatly come to mind on this
>> one are are MartinH and ChrisD.
>> 
>> Thoughts?
> 
> 
> Confused thoughts.  What do you mean by "the whole thing" in this
> context - the FP register-printing code that I originally posted which
> prompted this correction?

Yes.

Andrew