From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7848 invoked by alias); 20 Mar 2002 20:30:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 7691 invoked from network); 20 Mar 2002 20:30:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 20 Mar 2002 20:30:04 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CA733EDB; Wed, 20 Mar 2002 15:30:04 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3C98F14B.7040504@cygnus.com> Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 12:30:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:0.9.8) Gecko/20020210 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jim Blandy Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz , fnf@redhat.com, Mark Kettenis , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA/stabs] Fix for line table problems (was: Re: [RFC] Gdb line table implementation tweak) References: <200202272320.g1RNK5e14347@fishpond.ninemoons.com> <20020317014816.B1589@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00390.txt.bz2 > [This is long. Feel free to skip to the patch at the very end, and > stop to take a gander at the testsuite numbers in the middle :)] > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 04:20:05PM -0700, Fred Fish wrote: > >> > Fred, could you look into these failures? > >> >> Yes, but I would need access to a host system that exhibits >> the failures. Given a pointer and access to such a system, >> I can try and see what is going on. > > > I've got it. It's almost exactly like the bug I fixed in binutils > addr2line a few hours ago. We do not have an N_SLINE at the beginning > of the function. Our starting lines for functions have, as a result, > always been a little odd... Jim, would you be able to bump this one up a bit on your things to do list? I believe it addresses the regressions MichaelC detected just prior to 5.2 being branched and is on the high priority list. Andrew