From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-13520-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 12165 invoked by alias); 20 Mar 2002 02:39:49 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 12082 invoked from network); 20 Mar 2002 02:39:48 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 20 Mar 2002 02:39:48 -0000
Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 51F143DAB; Tue, 19 Mar 2002 21:39:48 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <3C97F673.7080306@cygnus.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 18:39:00 -0000
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:0.9.8) Gecko/20020210
X-Accept-Language: en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>
Cc: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com>,
	gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: GDB CVS won't build on OSF4.0's cc
References: <org0dofodw.fsf@guarana.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>	<or3d9ofncw.fsf@guarana.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>	<15134.37007.772051.431723@kwikemart.cygnus.com>	<or66e5ckl5.fsf@guarana.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>	<15140.51449.939073.693253@kwikemart.cygnus.com>	<orit89qkmo.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>	<15511.30770.115770.867801@localhost.redhat.com>	<orbsdkjtoo.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>	<15511.34746.193064.112834@localhost.redhat.com> <ord6y0ht94.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00372.txt.bz2

> 
> Great.
> 
> 
>> Is there a bug report for this?
> 
> 
> Other than the one that came with the patch posted to this mailing
> list?  I don't think so?  Should I create one, install the patch and
> then close it?

I counted 4 or 5!  You should look at gdb/390, there may still be 
``issues''.

 > I'm not aware of such GDB policies :-(

I think people doing this are viewed in a positive light (however there 
isn't any strict requirement :-).

The rewritten web page reads:

> GDB has a Bug Database. It is used to track bugs (Problem Reports or PRs) and enhancements (Change Requests or CRs). In addition to problems encountered when running GDB, bugs include: errors or missing documentation; missing test cases; web changes; work in progress; dummy reports for fixed but unreported bugs; entries of not-a-bugs; and even adminstrivia.

Andrew