From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5848 invoked by alias); 10 Mar 2002 22:26:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 5711 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2002 22:26:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (24.112.135.44) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 Mar 2002 22:26:54 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FD9C3CA9; Sun, 10 Mar 2002 17:26:52 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3C8BDDAB.9020504@cygnus.com> Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 14:26:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:0.9.8) Gecko/20020210 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] include/gdb/signals.h References: <20020310122638.B29124@nevyn.them.org> <3C8BB96B.1020704@cygnus.com> <20020310171044.A9299@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00150.txt.bz2 >> There should also be an entry for src/include/ChangeLog indicating the >> presence of the new directory. > > > Good thought. Since DJ said it wouldn't cause a problem, shall I > commit this? Commit to src, yep. I'm trying to figure out if DJ's reply: > I'm just wondering how DJ would react to the addition of an entry in >> gcc/include/ChangeLog there isn't a corresponding directory (gcc/include >> is the master yet really it isn't :-) > > > Not a problem. The scripts ignore anything in src that isn't also in > gcc, and this wouldn't be the first ignored subdirectory. is an ok to also commit the ChangeLog entry to the GCC include directory. I guess it is a doesn't matter. Come the revolution (GCC+GDB merge) I'd like to try to avoid a merge that looses src/include related ChangeLog entries. Andrew