From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-13240-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 20654 invoked by alias); 7 Mar 2002 13:30:21 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 20604 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2002 13:30:17 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO kerberos.suse.cz) (195.47.106.10)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 7 Mar 2002 13:30:17 -0000
Received: from chimera.suse.cz (chimera.suse.cz [10.20.0.2])
	by kerberos.suse.cz (SuSE SMTP server) with ESMTP id AAF6F59D35E
	for <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>; Thu,  7 Mar 2002 14:30:16 +0100 (CET)
Received: from suse.cz (leviathan.suse.cz [10.20.1.56])
	by chimera.suse.cz (8.11.0/8.11.0/SuSE Linux 8.11.0-0.4) with ESMTP id g27DUGN25996
	for <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>; Thu, 7 Mar 2002 14:30:16 +0100
X-Authentication-Warning: chimera.suse.cz: Host leviathan.suse.cz [10.20.1.56] claimed to be suse.cz
Message-ID: <3C877978.2030903@suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2002 05:30:00 -0000
From: Michal Ludvig <mludvig@suse.cz>
Organization: SuSE CR
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.8) Gecko/20020204
X-Accept-Language: cs, cz, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: [patch] Re: x86-64-tdep.h cleanup
References: <3C84EAA8.2000900@suse.cz> 	<1020305162947.ZM18587@localhost.localdomain> 	<3C85E8B8.5030102@suse.cz> <1020306173000.ZM23183@localhost.localdomain>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00092.txt.bz2

Kevin Buettner wrote:
> (Yes, approved.)

Thanks, for now I commited this change since noone voted against it. I 
will try to solve the other cleanup later.
Index: x86-64-tdep.h
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/x86-64-tdep.h,v
retrieving revision 1.1
diff -c -3 -p -r1.1 x86-64-tdep.h
*** x86-64-tdep.h       2001/09/21 12:19:15     1.1
--- x86-64-tdep.h       2002/03/07 13:26:10
***************
*** 24,41 ****
   #define X86_64_TDEP_H

   #include "i386-tdep.h"
- #include <sys/reg.h>
-
- /* Mapping between the general-purpose registers in `struct user'
-    format and GDB's register array layout.  */
-
- static int x86_64_regmap[] = {
-   RAX, RDX, RCX, RBX,
-   RSI, RDI, RBP, RSP,
-   R8, R9, R10, R11,
-   R12, R13, R14, R15,
-   RIP, EFLAGS
- };

   /* Number of all registers */
   #define X86_64_NUM_REGS (51)
--- 24,29 ----
Index: x86-64-linux-nat.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/x86-64-linux-nat.c,v
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -c -3 -p -r1.5 x86-64-linux-nat.c
*** x86-64-linux-nat.c  2002/02/24 22:14:33     1.5
--- x86-64-linux-nat.c  2002/03/07 13:26:10
***************
*** 33,39 ****
--- 33,51 ----
   #include <sys/debugreg.h>
   #include <sys/syscall.h>
   #include <sys/procfs.h>
+ #include <sys/reg.h>

+ /* Mapping between the general-purpose registers in `struct user'
+    format and GDB's register array layout.  */
+
+ static int x86_64_regmap[] = {
+   RAX, RDX, RCX, RBX,
+   RSI, RDI, RBP, RSP,
+   R8, R9, R10, R11,
+   R12, R13, R14, R15,
+   RIP, EFLAGS
+ };
+
   static unsigned long
   x86_64_linux_dr_get (int regnum)
   {



Michal Ludvig
-- 
* SuSE CR, s.r.o     * mludvig@suse.cz
* +420 2 9654 5373   * http://www.suse.cz