From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27880 invoked by alias); 5 Mar 2002 12:51:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 27765 invoked from network); 5 Mar 2002 12:50:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO kerberos.suse.cz) (195.47.106.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 5 Mar 2002 12:50:57 -0000 Received: from chimera.suse.cz (chimera.suse.cz [10.20.0.2]) by kerberos.suse.cz (SuSE SMTP server) with ESMTP id 8A8C059D35F; Tue, 5 Mar 2002 13:50:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from suse.cz (leviathan.suse.cz [10.20.1.56]) by chimera.suse.cz (8.11.0/8.11.0/SuSE Linux 8.11.0-0.4) with ESMTP id g25CouN08102; Tue, 5 Mar 2002 13:50:56 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: chimera.suse.cz: Host leviathan.suse.cz [10.20.1.56] claimed to be suse.cz Message-ID: <3C84BF2F.4010202@suse.cz> Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2002 04:51:00 -0000 From: Michal Ludvig Organization: SuSE CR User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.8) Gecko/20020204 X-Accept-Language: cs, cz, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Cc: Andrew Cagney Subject: Re: [RFA] Bugfixes on x86-64 target References: <3C7F9777.4070009@cygnus.com> <3C835553.4080201@suse.cz> <3C84147D.5040504@cygnus.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00046.txt.bz2 > x86-64 (--target=x86_64-linux-gnu broken) > Michal Ludvig mludvig@suse.cz Andrew Cagney wrote: >> Andrew Cagney wrote: >> Can I suggest adding your self to the maintainers file as an obvious >> fix (don't forget to post the patch). > Oops, sorry. I was thinking of write-after-approval. Is it wrong? Can I remove the "broken" word? The target is not broken when compiled natively. Michal Ludvig