From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18599 invoked by alias); 4 Mar 2002 16:03:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 18375 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2002 16:03:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (66.31.105.161) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Mar 2002 16:03:20 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A18793E67; Sun, 3 Mar 2002 11:44:37 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3C8252F5.9060106@cygnus.com> Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2002 08:03:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:0.9.8) Gecko/20020210 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cgd@broadcom.com Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [applied mips sim patch] Use igen-generated opcode fields References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-03/txt/msg00028.txt.bz2 > "why do it by hand when igen does it for you?" > > I believe this addresses (most of) the comment at the top of the file: > > // In mips.igen, the semantics for many of the instructions were created > // using code generated by gencode. Those semantic segments could be > // greatly simplified. > > but i'm not quite sure. Any comments? Ya! Thanks. Andrew > I ran a combined tree built for target mips64-elf through check-gcc > check-gdb check-sim, and verified that there were no changes in the > tests from a clean tree. > > >