From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19382 invoked by alias); 28 Feb 2002 17:17:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 19290 invoked from network); 28 Feb 2002 17:17:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 28 Feb 2002 17:17:43 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FFAB3D79; Thu, 28 Feb 2002 12:17:41 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3C7E6634.4010209@cygnus.com> Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 09:17:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:0.9.8) Gecko/20020210 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa] Always define all of TARGET_SIGNAL_* References: <20020227221148.A30753@nevyn.them.org> <3C7E456C.6090605@cygnus.com> <20020228115139.A8496@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00745.txt.bz2 > On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 09:57:48AM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: > >> >I've been meaning to fix this since I noticed it last summer. These >> >numbers >> >are part of the remote protocol. While I think the last ones are never >> >sent >> >over the wire, they could be (with the exception of TARGET_SIGNAL_LAST >> >which >> >is -not- part of the protocol, as I understand it). Having them jump >> >around >> >is bad. > >> >> Wasn't this enum going to be moved to signals.h? > > > I think so, but I didn't see any pressing reason to. If you want, I > can do that. > > OK otherwise? I'd leave it until after things branch and then fix it properly in the trunk. Andrew