From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2735 invoked by alias); 28 Feb 2002 14:57:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2541 invoked from network); 28 Feb 2002 14:57:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (24.112.135.44) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 28 Feb 2002 14:57:51 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C244C3D79; Thu, 28 Feb 2002 09:57:48 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3C7E456C.6090605@cygnus.com> Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 06:57:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:0.9.8) Gecko/20020210 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [rfa] Always define all of TARGET_SIGNAL_* References: <20020227221148.A30753@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00739.txt.bz2 > I've been meaning to fix this since I noticed it last summer. These numbers > are part of the remote protocol. While I think the last ones are never sent > over the wire, they could be (with the exception of TARGET_SIGNAL_LAST which > is -not- part of the protocol, as I understand it). Having them jump around > is bad. Wasn't this enum going to be moved to signals.h? Andrew