From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1508 invoked by alias); 27 Feb 2002 06:50:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 1444 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2002 06:50:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (24.112.135.44) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 27 Feb 2002 06:50:04 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE0853DF9; Wed, 27 Feb 2002 01:49:58 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3C7C8196.2030005@cygnus.com> Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 22:50:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:0.9.8) Gecko/20020210 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] PTRACE_*REGS and x86-64-linux support for gdbserver References: <20020227013749.A20342@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00716.txt.bz2 Yes, ok. I noticed, in an earlier patch you create a new ``..._linux'' .dat file. That addresses the only concern I had - were some of these register format files GNU/Linux specific. If they were, you were renaming them. enjoy, Andrew