From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23074 invoked by alias); 19 Feb 2002 16:37:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 22943 invoked from network); 19 Feb 2002 16:37:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 Feb 2002 16:37:35 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E92723D11; Tue, 19 Feb 2002 11:37:35 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3C727F4F.5020100@cygnus.com> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 08:37:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:0.9.8) Gecko/20020210 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: muller@cerbere.u-strasbg.fr, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFC] document Cygwin native specific commands References: <4.2.0.58.20020219102752.0248dc18@ics.u-strasbg.fr> <4760-Tue19Feb2002152216+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00500.txt.bz2 > > The GDB manual uses @kindex to put all the GDB commands into a > separate index, while @cindex entries go into the Concept Index. > Right now, this line near the beginning of gdb.texinfo: > > @syncodeindex ky cp > > causes the @kindex entries to be printed together with the @cindex > entries. But it is enough to remove that line to cause them to be in > 2 different indices. Hmm. Given a dump of all of GDB's commands, should there be a kindex for each? What about the reverse? I think we might have just stumbled across something that is feasible for the ARI to check. enjoy, Andrew