From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25002 invoked by alias); 18 Feb 2002 14:58:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 24878 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2002 14:58:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (24.112.135.44) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 18 Feb 2002 14:58:17 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2C773D0D; Mon, 18 Feb 2002 09:58:16 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3C711688.8090405@cygnus.com> Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 06:58:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:0.9.8) Gecko/20020210 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Peter.Schauer" Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFD] How to fix FRAME_CHAIN_VALID redefinition in config/i386/tm-i386v4.h ? References: <200202180833.JAA05705@reisser.regent.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00471.txt.bz2 > That would work fine for me. Thanks! > To be 100% backwards compatible, I think that the default should be > file_frame_chain_valid though. > We could change that to func_frame_chain_valid in another patch then. That is DanielJ's contention. Leave it as a separate change (I'll create a bug report for that - I've got the GDB branch nerves). Andrew