From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26932 invoked by alias); 14 Feb 2002 03:23:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 26877 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2002 03:23:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (24.112.135.44) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 14 Feb 2002 03:23:31 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37B733CC5; Wed, 13 Feb 2002 22:23:30 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3C6B2DB1.9060304@cygnus.com> Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 19:23:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:0.9.8) Gecko/20020210 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg McGary Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: PATCH: new "void" memory region attribute References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00385.txt.bz2 > enum mem_access_mode > { > - MEM_RW, /* read/write */ > - MEM_RO, /* read only */ > - MEM_WO /* write only */ > + MEM_VOID = 0, > + MEM_READ = 1, > + MEM_WRITE = 2, > + MEM_RW = MEM_READ | MEM_WRITE, > }; > Greg, I'm just wondering why this part change? Wouldn't just adding a MEM_VOID entry have been easier? Andrew