From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2191 invoked by alias); 13 Feb 2002 00:31:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 2094 invoked from network); 13 Feb 2002 00:31:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 13 Feb 2002 00:31:00 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 878903CC2; Tue, 12 Feb 2002 19:31:00 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3C69B3C3.3000502@cygnus.com> Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2002 16:31:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:0.9.8) Gecko/20020210 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cgd@broadcom.com Cc: fche@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] make MIPS sim mips.igen model names one per line. References: <3C683E9B.4070809@cygnus.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00344.txt.bz2 > Yes, the debate over this patch occured long ago. My memory is that it >> was agreed that the standard MIPS defined variants should all appear on >> a single line but specific ISA implementations got to have their own line > > > If that's the way people want to go, I can do that, but: > > (1) that is directly in opposition to what you indicated was your > preference in December 2000 (see the mail I fwded you 8-), and That long ago! > (2) I think it'll be easier for Eric to do his mips32/mips64 merge, > then subsequently for me to merge the mipsV changes we have here, > if it's one-per-line. (In addition to being esier to get the file > into the one-per-line state to begin with. 8-) > With 20:20 hindsite, I really do not care :-) If life will be easier for Eric then yes, separate lines. Andrew