From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10772 invoked by alias); 11 Feb 2002 21:58:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10711 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2002 21:58:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 11 Feb 2002 21:58:58 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 010743CC2; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 16:58:51 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3C683E9B.4070809@cygnus.com> Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 13:58:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:0.9.8) Gecko/20020210 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cgd@broadcom.com Cc: fche@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] make MIPS sim mips.igen model names one per line. References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00336.txt.bz2 > > In this case, I fail to see how _mixing_ them in mips.igen for a > single set of ISAs (the standars mipsI ... mipsIV, and soon to be > mips32, mips64), is the right thing. > > One way or the other, I think it should be consistent at least for the > MIPS ISA 'models'. There's no reason to have inconsistency. Yes, the debate over this patch occured long ago. My memory is that it was agreed that the standard MIPS defined variants should all appear on a single line but specific ISA implementations got to have their own line Andrew