From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26572 invoked by alias); 10 Feb 2002 07:39:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 26522 invoked from network); 10 Feb 2002 07:39:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (24.114.26.18) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 10 Feb 2002 07:39:31 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 681433E6A; Sun, 10 Feb 2002 02:39:28 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3C6623B0.1060708@cygnus.com> Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2002 23:39:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:0.9.7) Gecko/20020103 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cgd@broadcom.com Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH RFA] fix some sim spelling errors. References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00301.txt.bz2 > Any objections to the following? > > I didn't fix things which i thought might have been valid spellings > in, uh, a different part of the world or which the dictionary i > consulted considered acceptable (but less-used or less-desirable), > even if ispell or spell whined about them. 8-) http://www.dict.mq.edu.au :-) > I'd normally call this an obvious patch, but, well, some might see > this as undesirable because it changes the files. So, i figured I'd > ask first. If this is OK, i'll call future similar changes obvious. Spelling is obvious. Andrew