From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20327 invoked by alias); 8 Feb 2002 16:51:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 20260 invoked from network); 8 Feb 2002 16:51:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (24.114.26.18) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Feb 2002 16:51:13 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AA413E77; Fri, 8 Feb 2002 11:51:10 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3C6401FE.1060302@cygnus.com> Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2002 08:51:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:0.9.7) Gecko/20020103 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, "Martin M. Hunt" Subject: Re: [RFA] fix for utils.c bool problem References: <200202072133.NAA28346@cygnus.com> <20020207163944.A30605@nevyn.them.org> <20020208105750.A16802@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00233.txt.bz2 > This is the patch I alluded to earlier today on binutils@. It's not >> quite complete, since TUI is also affected; I've attached mine. I'm >> quite surprised that this fixes the problem for you without the >> corresponding bfd patch that I haven't committed yet! > > > No one objected, so I've committed this. As far as I know GDB should > build everywhere it used to before I started playing with bool, as long > as you update both BFD and GDB. If I'm wrong, please let me know. Dan I couldn't see the point of the patch. The immediate problem - bfd.h including was fixed. The next step, I thought, was fix bfd.h. It isn't hurting in a major way and definitly breaks GDB's coding style. Andrew