From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17038 invoked by alias); 8 Feb 2002 04:59:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16961 invoked from network); 8 Feb 2002 04:59:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (24.114.26.18) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Feb 2002 04:59:40 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08A743E60; Thu, 7 Feb 2002 23:59:37 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3C635B36.5080104@cygnus.com> Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2002 20:59:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:0.9.7) Gecko/20020103 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Elena Zannoni Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] New gdb port: Hitachi SH5 (sh64-elf) References: <15459.21685.558343.429478@localhost.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00220.txt.bz2 > +#ifdef GDB_TARGET_IS_SH64 > + case bfd_mach_sh5: BTW, is this needed? I noticed that the sh64 opcodes (and sim?), when it was submitted, looked messed up as it didn't include all the assemblers. I suggested that be fixed. Andrew