From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12802 invoked by alias); 1 Feb 2002 21:10:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 12747 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2002 21:10:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.redhat.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 1 Feb 2002 21:10:28 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DD9A3E02; Fri, 1 Feb 2002 16:10:17 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3C5B0438.6010005@cygnus.com> Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2002 13:10:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:0.9.7) Gecko/20020103 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFA] Basic structure to describe register formats References: <20020201152209.A17528@nevyn.them.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-02/txt/msg00009.txt.bz2 Almost approved, I've been pokeing at random targets that once worked and they have now all been broken by multi-arch. > @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@ > +name:arm > +resume:r11,sp,pc > +4:r0 > +4:r1 > +4:r2 My only quarm is with this. It extends the G packet definition a little - lines with a leading letter get ignored just like comments and blanks. Correct? Any way I think EXPEDITE to better word for describing what is to be done with those registers. SID uses that word to describe this exact same list. Andrew