From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30803 invoked by alias); 31 Jan 2002 20:27:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 30718 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2002 20:27:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.cygnus.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 31 Jan 2002 20:27:54 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.cygnus.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEA2F3DDC; Thu, 31 Jan 2002 15:27:47 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3C59A8C3.7060102@cygnus.com> Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 12:27:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:0.9.7) Gecko/20020103 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: obrien@FreeBSD.org Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix BFD's core support on FreeBSD 4.[2-9] References: <20020131111656.A1369@dragon.nuxi.com> <3C599A85.3060906@cygnus.com> <20020131120018.B1818@dragon.nuxi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00819.txt.bz2 > On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 02:27:01PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote: > >> > For the life of me I cannot figure out which branch to commit this to >> > in case there is a 5.1.2. Should I use the gdb_5_1-2001-07-29-branch or >> > gdb_5_1_0_1-2002-01-03-branch ? > >> >> gdb_5_1-2001-07-29-branch > > > I did not regen bfd/configure as the diff from what is in CVS to what > autoconf 2.13 (Sourceware's 2.13.000227) produced was *MASSIVE* (but > wasn't in mainline when I made this same commit). What is the right > version of autoconf to use now? 000227. Regenerating configure from configure.in, I'm only seeing a one line change. There was a massive difference between -r gdb_5_1-2001-07-29-branchpoint and -r gdb_5_1-2001-07-29-branch. Andrew