From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20691 invoked by alias); 31 Jan 2002 19:27:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 20631 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2002 19:27:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.cygnus.com) (216.138.202.10) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 31 Jan 2002 19:27:15 -0000 Received: from cygnus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.cygnus.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3908D3DDC; Thu, 31 Jan 2002 14:27:02 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3C599A85.3060906@cygnus.com> Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 11:27:00 -0000 From: Andrew Cagney User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:0.9.7) Gecko/20020103 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: obrien@FreeBSD.org Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix BFD's core support on FreeBSD 4.[2-9] References: <20020131111656.A1369@dragon.nuxi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-01/txt/msg00816.txt.bz2 > For the life of me I cannot figure out which branch to commit this to > in case there is a 5.1.2. Should I use the gdb_5_1-2001-07-29-branch or > gdb_5_1_0_1-2002-01-03-branch ? (Yes, ok I know, I've been roundly slapped for doing a 5.1.0.1 :-( At least I managed to get around the request for 5.1.0.2 :-) gdb_5_1-2001-07-29-branch Thanks for doing this. Andrew